Long-term follow-up of non-myasthenic patients with early-stage thymoma who underwent extended thymectomy or limited resection.

BACKGROUD: The standard resection for early-stage thymoma is total thymectomy and complete tumour excision with or without myasthenia gravis but the optimal surgery mode for patients with early-stage non-myasthenic thymoma is debatable. This study analysed the oncological outcomes for non-myasthenic patients with early-stage thymoma treated by thymectomy or limited resection in the long term. METHODS: Patients who had resections of thymic neoplasms at Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan between December 1997 and March 2013 were recruited, exclusive of those combined clinical evidence of myasthenia gravis were reviewed. A total of 113 patients were retrospectively reviewed with pathologic early stage (Masaoka stage I and II) thymoma who underwent limited resection or extended thymectomy to compare their long-term oncologic and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The median observation time was 134.1 months [interquartile range (IQR) 90.7-176.1 months]. In our cohort, 52 patients underwent extended thymectomy and 61 patients underwent limited resection. Shorter duration of surgery (p < 0.001) and length of stay (p = 0.006) were demonstrated in limited resection group. Six patients experienced thymoma recurrence, two of which had combined myasthenia gravis development after recurrence. There was no significant difference (p = 0.851) in freedom-from-recurrence, with similar 10-year freedom-from-recurrence rates between the limited resection group (96.2 %) and the thymectomy group (93.2 %). Tumour-related survival was also not significantly different between groups (p = 0.726).result CONCLUSION: Patients with early-stage non-myasthenic thymoma who underwent limited resection without complete excision of the thymus achieved similar oncologic outcomes during the long-term follow-up and better peri-operative results compared to those who underwent thymectomy.

Surgery or Surveillance for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Clinical Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

We aimed to evaluate the role of esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with clinically complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Data of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy between October 2008 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The criteria for cCR include: (1) tumor resolution on computed tomography, (2) maximum standardized uptake value decrement >35% on positron-emission tomography-computed tomography scan, and (3) a negative endoscopic biopsy result. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between patients who received surveillance only (surveillance) and those who underwent surgery. A total of 154 patients with cCR, including 54 in the surveillance group and 100 in the surgery group, were included. The 5-year OS rates in the surveillance and surgery groups were 47.9% and 36.9 %, respectively (P= 0.210). The 5-year DFS rates were 38.1% and 28.2%, respectively (P = 0.203). Surgery was not a prognostic factor in the multivariable analysis (OS: HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.69-2.33, P = 0.453; DFS: HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.60-1.96, P = 0.795). In the surgery group, ypT0N0, ypT+Nany, and ypT0N+ were noted in 54%, 37%, and 9% of patients, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 55.8%, 22.2%, and 12.4%, respectively (P = 0.001). No survival differences were noted between the surveillance and surgery groups. However, 46% of cCR patients in the surgery group did not have pathological complete response, and their outcomes were poor. Esophagectomy may be the only way to identify patients with residual disease.

Overall Survival for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Multiple Primary Cancers after Curative Esophagectomy-A Retrospective Single-Institution Study.

Background: Advances in surgical techniques and treatment modalities have improved the outcomes of esophageal cancer, yet difficult decision making for physicians while encountering multiple primary cancers (MPCs) continues to exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term survival for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) associated with MPCs. Methods: Data from 544 patients with esophageal SCC who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2017 were reviewed to identify the presence of simultaneous or metachronous primary cancers. The prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: Three hundred and ninety-seven patients after curative esophagectomy were included, with a median observation time of 44.2 months (range 2.6−178.6 months). Out of 52 patients (13.1%) with antecedent/synchronous cancers and 296 patients without MPCs (control group), 49 patients (12.3%) developed subsequent cancers after surgery. The most common site of other primary cancers was the head and neck (69/101; 68.3%), which showed no inferiority in OS. Sex and advanced clinical stage (III/IV) were independent risk factors (p = 0.031 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Once curative esophagectomy can be achieved, surgery should be selected as a potential therapeutic approach if indicated, even with antecedent/synchronous MPCs. Subsequent primary cancers were often observed in esophageal SCC, and optimal surveillance planning was recommended.